An overcome approach to the Melting Pot Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

An conquer approach to the Melting Pot - Essay ExampleEnlistment was next used after the draw and quarter together States entered World War I in 1917. The first peacetime c exclusively up came with the Selective Training and returns Act of 1940. Active conscription (the draft) ended in 1973. Currently, male U.S. citizens, if aged eighteen through twenty five, are indispensable to register with the Selective Service System, whose mission is to provide manpower to the arm forces in an emergency including a Health Care Personnel Delivery System2 and to lead an Alternative Service Program for men classified as conscientious objectors during a draft. No whiz has been prosecuted for violating the conscription law in the USA since 1986.3Conscription should be considered as a hypothetical cure-all to cut down, for example, crime, teenage pregnancy and substance abuse rates decline or to foster a more hard-working, respectful, disciplined, honorable and prepared for life youth4. Enli stment could surely help all of those immigrants in the States to get more, deeper and better integrated within the American society by helping their adoptive country to restitute peace and freedom where needed by the time they give to the society something in reward for all they have already received. Mandatory military service is one of the oldest forms of national service and is common to both(prenominal) democratic and non-democratic countries. Such democratic countries as Austria, Brazil, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Israel, Mexico, Norway, Russia, South Korea, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey require male and occasionally young-bearing(prenominal) citizens to participate in military service when they become 18 years old. These countries prove that conscription, when handled properly, can be an asset to the military, the society and the conscript. Furthermore,... An overcome approach to the Melting PotAfter the introduction of a bill sticker to reinstate the military draft by R epresentative Charles Rangel (D-NY) on January 7, 2003, rumours went out on the real cook of this measure. A little over a year after, another(prenominal) bill, this time by Representative Tim Johnson, denote on October 5, 2004, that the House defeated a bill that would have reinstated the military draft. H.R. 163 was introduced by and would have required every U.S. citizen, and every other person residing in the United States, between the ages of 18 and 26 to carry through a two-year period of national service, unless exempted, either as a member of an active or reserve component of the armed forces or in a civilian capacity that promotes national defense . Detractors of H.R. 163 argued that too many have already lost their lives at the battle field and the Vietnam issue became a recurrent double edged argument. However, it has to be understood and taken into account that the USA are relate in several campaigns all over the world to guarantee freedom and Human Rights where oth erwise would be rotten to the core. In addition to this, the military draft should be assumed not as a punishment or backward movement, more proper of a reactionary society than of a lead and modern one, but as a different solution for daily concerns. Besides, military draft is another way to interpret the path to the achievement of the American Dream, overcoming the well worn Melting Pot publication recruits and conscripts can enter the military branch of their liking, request to be trained in a circumstantial field, and serve in the state of their choice.